NCAAs
Re: NCAAs
**** The NCAAs are what they are: No fans, but we can watch the streaming. 125: Paetzell: should win his 1st bout, then he will likely have Camacho of NCst who beat last years runner up (Mueller). If he wins the mostly a rematch with Glory in the Quarters. 133: Farro: Schwartz of UNCO. I would favor Nick based on strength of competition. Then he gets #2 Gross. In the wrestlebacks he could face Casey Cobb or Lamont/madrigal. Could be winnable or not. 141: Pomrinca: as mentioned earlier he gets Lee of PSU right off the bat. In the wrestlebacks he will face the winner of Droegenmueller/Filius or Leeth/Cheek. 149: Hoffman: he gets Boo Llewellen (tough match). If he wins he gets the winner of Pohlmeyer/Hagan.
Re: NCAAs
Harvard is out.
Willie Saylor
@MatScoutWillie
· 14h
Multiple sources confirming Harvard is out.
Philip Conigliaro
@phidman
Yea we are done. Disappointed to say the least. Almost unbelievable. We are living in strange times.
113
6:34 PM - Mar 11, 2020
Willie Saylor
@MatScoutWillie
· 14h
Multiple sources confirming Harvard is out.
Philip Conigliaro
@phidman
Yea we are done. Disappointed to say the least. Almost unbelievable. We are living in strange times.
113
6:34 PM - Mar 11, 2020
Re: NCAAs
I'm already over it.
Was labeled a 'rant' so how could anyone take it seriously? And an invitation to research through the WaPo is hilarious. Attack my opinion but leave personal stuff out. Amazing how easily some people are triggered.
IMO, Lehigh got extremely difficult draws this year; worse than usual. Being seeded top 16 is critical for 1st round match-ups. 4 of our guys were not. 7, 18, 31, 28, 7, 3, 13, 22, 9.
Was labeled a 'rant' so how could anyone take it seriously? And an invitation to research through the WaPo is hilarious. Attack my opinion but leave personal stuff out. Amazing how easily some people are triggered.
IMO, Lehigh got extremely difficult draws this year; worse than usual. Being seeded top 16 is critical for 1st round match-ups. 4 of our guys were not. 7, 18, 31, 28, 7, 3, 13, 22, 9.
Re: NCAAs
Kind of figured it was skin check.
I am curious if red heads(and blonds) might be more vulnerable to skin problems.Certainly a little more vulnerable to skin cancer. A decade + ago my doctor told me to wear sunglasses a lot because blue-green-hazel eyes are more vulnerable to macular degeneration from UV. We didn't have skin checks when I was in HS or I might know the answer, had three red head and least one real blond teammates
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: FloridaGuy, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 47 guests