125 - #23 Lane
133 - #22 McGonagle
141- #17 Hines
149- #24 Bryant
157- #9 Humphreys
165- #19 Meyer
174- HM Logan
184- #15 Samuelson
197- #6 Beard
285- no ranking
Sorry, but a number of these look low
LU in Preseason rankings
-
- Posts: 1176
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2019 10:04 am
- Contact:
Re: LU in Preseason rankings
Well I just had a cheesesteak so I think I can comment:
Lane got hurt early and has no results
Crookham
Malyke is moving up, so prove yourself
MB3 did not go last year
Humph is the man, plain and simple
Meyer OK
174 is a work in progress
184 and 197 will do damage
285 total disrespect of NT
Lane got hurt early and has no results
Crookham
Malyke is moving up, so prove yourself
MB3 did not go last year
Humph is the man, plain and simple
Meyer OK
174 is a work in progress
184 and 197 will do damage
285 total disrespect of NT
Re: LU in Preseason rankings
FLO now has Taylor ranked mid-20s.
Re: LU in Preseason rankings
125 - #23 Lane
133 - #22 McGonagle
141- #17 Hines
149- #24 Bryant
157- #9 Humphreys
165- #19 Meyer
174- HM Logan
184- #15 Samuelson
197- #6 Beard
285- no ranking
Sorry, but a number of these look low
------------
Not clear but since you say 'sorry' we assume you mean they're ranked too high?
If you mean ranked too low, I can't complain (congrats on your 'cheerleading'). If the poll just goes to 25; Taylor likely ranks 23-28 to start; hasn't beaten anybody yet. Three Top 15s seems fair for now
133 - #22 McGonagle
141- #17 Hines
149- #24 Bryant
157- #9 Humphreys
165- #19 Meyer
174- HM Logan
184- #15 Samuelson
197- #6 Beard
285- no ranking
Sorry, but a number of these look low
------------
Not clear but since you say 'sorry' we assume you mean they're ranked too high?
If you mean ranked too low, I can't complain (congrats on your 'cheerleading'). If the poll just goes to 25; Taylor likely ranks 23-28 to start; hasn't beaten anybody yet. Three Top 15s seems fair for now
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], lu_alum and 36 guests