Re: BELIEVE IT OR NOT!!!
Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2024 6:34 pm
And yet 2 of their NCAA Champions are from PA and have 5 titles and 6 NCAA appearances between them. Then you have freshman Kasak do the 7 in a row to finish 3rd.
A Place For Lehigh Fans to Congregate Online Since 2015
https://lehighsportsforum.com/
And yet 2 of their NCAA Champions are from PA and have 5 titles and 6 NCAA appearances between them. Then you have freshman Kasak do the 7 in a row to finish 3rd.
We have a guy from Florida, we have an incoming recruit from Idaho, we were finalist in getting a kid from Arizona last year, we have a couple guys on our roster from California, we have a kid from Maine (who admittedly wrestled for a PA prep school) and NH (for the moment)......FloridaGuy wrote: ↑Sun Mar 24, 2024 9:55 pm >>>>>>> Cael recruited nationally at IowaSt and has continued recruiting nationally at psu for both hs and transfer recruits.
I’d like to see Lehigh broaden it’s recruiting horizons.
mookie wrote: ↑Sun Mar 24, 2024 12:12 pm Hopefully Lehigh put the 0-8 crew all in the same hotel room and sold their return tickets for cash.
Two in the double bed and two in roll away cots. Free breakfasts + a few buffets at the Golden Corral.
Re-entry into the Caruso Center dependent on being able to do 10 pull ups and bench their weight.
Ok so I guess it was a fantastically successful tournament despite being upset 12x and not having one ourselves (according to seeds) and sending 4 guys out for KC barbeque (3 of which have plenty of experience) on Thursday night.FloridaGuy wrote: ↑Sun Mar 24, 2024 2:43 pm >>>>>> MtnHawk and mookster back in their negative comfort zone.
Lehigh would only move up a notch or two in the team standings if all the 0-2 guys had all won a match and Taylor finished 7/8 th.
watch out, old man Florida gonna come and try to sweep the leg!whiz wit wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2024 11:12 am To me, assessing the Nationals results involves comparing the results with reasonable expectations at the outset of the tournament, not at the outset of the season. If the latter were the methodology, the team would get an A. But with the proper analysis, I would give a grade in the range of D+ to a charitable C-.
Well what I was saying in the other thread (about the season) is we should assess the season as-a-whole in terms of season-outset expectations. The team failed to meet its seeding expectations at the tournament, thats just a statistical fact. So we can say they underperformed at the tournament, although maybe there is some question if the seedings were based on enough evidence. Bigger picture for me is to reaffirm that the season is NOT just "practice for nationals" - and therefore still a good season.whiz wit wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2024 11:12 am To me, assessing the Nationals results involves comparing the results with reasonable expectations at the outset of the tournament, not at the outset of the season. If the latter were the methodology, the team would get an A. But with the proper analysis, I would give a grade in the range of D+ to a charitable C-.